| Newsgroups |
gmane.ietf.rohc |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
RFC4815 "Updates: 3095, 3241, 3843, 4019, 4362", as shown in its header.
Only RFC4995 (framework) is needed to implement profiles from RFC5225.
Not known issues on RFC5225 known as of yet.
///Ghyslain
Quoting Karthik Balaguru <[email protected]>:
> Hi,
> I find that ROHC V2 (RFC 5225) defines
> a second version of the profiles found in
> RFC 3095. But, does it take RFC 4815 into
> consideration ?
>
> Are there any known issues in RFC 5225 ?
>
> Thx in advans,
> Karthik Balaguru
>
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Ghyslain Pelletier <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > There are currently no known open issues on any of the ROHC profiles
> > based on RFC3095.
> >
> > All known issues have been corrected by RFC4815:
> > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4815.txt
> >
> > ///Ghyslain
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> > Behalf Of Karthik Balaguru
> > Sent: den 20 september 2008 13:26
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [rohc] ROHC v1 problems
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > What are the major and minor problems with ROHC v1 ?
> > Can anyone give me a link that explains the problems with ROHC
> > v1 ?
> >
> > Thx in advans,
> > Karthik Balaguru
> >
> >
>