[saag] Re: on derivative work rights statements in emails to Security Area mailing lists

> > > such claims deter participation by people without legal support
> > To clarify
> As our message indicated, please take this to the [email protected] list

That isn't what you wrote before (you mentioned [email protected] solely
regarding work "to revise 5378"), and in any case it's an inappropriate
response to clarification questions.

You sent email to [email protected] calling for bans but failing to make the
scope of the bans clear. The question of whether this includes, e.g.,
banning RFC 5831 also belongs on [email protected].

---D. J. Bernstein

P.S. For readers bumping into this message who haven't seen the context:
Please see https://blog.cr.yp.to/20251004-weakened.html to understand
what's actually going on here.


===== NOTICES =====

This document may not be modified, and derivative works of it may not be
created, and it may not be published except as an Internet-Draft. (That
sentence is the official language from IETF's "Legend Instructions" for
the situation that "the Contributor does not wish to allow modifications
nor to allow publication as an RFC". I'm fine with redistribution of
copies of this document; the issue is with modification.)

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]