[saag] Re: post quantum guidance draft

On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 7:12 AM Stephen Farrell <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Again, that's fair enough, and I'm not arguing strongly
> that my draft be published as-is. I'm more interested
> in a discussion as to how we could provide some useful
> guidance, given the zoo we've created. If that's done some
> other way that works, that's fine by me.
>

I think that discussion would be a lot more productive if it
didn't happen in the context of this draft and the implicit
request for it to be worked on in the IETF.

-Ekr

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]