[saag] Re: post quantum guidance draft

Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> Mon, 1 Dec 2025 16:02:35 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.saag
Message-ID <[email protected]>

On 01/12/2025 15:38, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> I think that discussion would be a lot more productive if it
> didn't happen in the context of this draft and the implicit
> request for it to be worked on in the IETF.

Huh? Isn't writing a draft how we do things around here?
I'm quite puzzled by your comment TBH.

If someone else wants to propose something else, great.

S.

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 236 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

wnsEABYIACMWIQQwbnhHy1kPJkWsM6fk2On5l6gz3QUCaS28GwUDAAAAAAAKCRDk2On5l6gz3Xb8
AQCzvkMCx5Wr+FsMyQIoZlJJ8toQGlzIVkiIHKvkiSlNLAD+JqedH2Ukr0kYrKCURaHWNsRBXKAi
jZ46YEtJu71MPwE=
=KkR2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----