[saag] Re: post quantum guidance draft
Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> Mon, 1 Dec 2025 16:02:35 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.saag |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 01/12/2025 15:38, Eric Rescorla wrote: > I think that discussion would be a lot more productive if it > didn't happen in the context of this draft and the implicit > request for it to be worked on in the IETF. Huh? Isn't writing a draft how we do things around here? I'm quite puzzled by your comment TBH. If someone else wants to propose something else, great. S. _______________________________________________ saag mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 236 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wnsEABYIACMWIQQwbnhHy1kPJkWsM6fk2On5l6gz3QUCaS28GwUDAAAAAAAKCRDk2On5l6gz3Xb8 AQCzvkMCx5Wr+FsMyQIoZlJJ8toQGlzIVkiIHKvkiSlNLAD+JqedH2Ukr0kYrKCURaHWNsRBXKAi jZ46YEtJu71MPwE= =KkR2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----