[saag] Re: post quantum guidance draft

On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 06:10:20PM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote:
> At least this conversation is better than the multi-headed
> appeal-o-rama hydra.

Yes, quite.

> My principal objection is that I do not know who the target audience
> is; who would benefit from this, and — most importantly — follow
> it?

The target audience would be "the IETF" (which includes the IESG and
protocol implementors even if they are not IETF participants).  The
Internet would be the beneficiary.  The implementors would be: the IESG
and/or RFC-Editor _if_ the I-D were to include a do-not-publish type of
action (e.g., a moratorium on non-hybrid PQ would take sucha form),
and/or the actual protocol implementors otherwise.

Nico
-- 

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]