[saag] Re: post quantum guidance draft

On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 10:11 AM Loganaden Velvindron <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 at 22:09, John Mattsson
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I agree with most EKR says. I read the draft again. It is unclear to me,
> which problem the draft want to solve, and what the assumptions are for
> making the recommendation in 3.2 that I don't agree with. Any
> recommendations will be age very quickly so I think a BCP is wrong.
> >
> What are the changes that can be made to the draft that address those
> issues ?
>

This framing ("how do we make this draft acceptable") is exactly what I am
objecting to.

It's not up to those of us who are skeptical about the entire project to
propose a set of changes to make the draft less objectionable, because the
draft need not be IETF work at all.

-Ekr

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]