[saag] Re: [EXT] Interests on Initiating the standardiza tion work related to "Zero Trust"?

We can try to limit the scope of the "zero trust" in the WG charter
description, based on the unsolved problem statements, and interested
topics.

The aim of standard is to clear the mess, step by step.

Best Regards

Aijun Wang
China Telecom

-----Original Message-----
From: Nico Williams [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2025 1:10 PM
To: Salz, Rich <[email protected]>
Cc: Harry Halpin <[email protected]>; Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
<[email protected]>; Aijun Wang <[email protected]>; [email protected];
Benfeng Chen <[email protected]>; Erik Johnson
<[email protected]>; [email protected];
[email protected]; Hillary Baron <[email protected]>; Aijun
Wang <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [saag] Re: [EXT] Interests on Initiating the standardization
work related to "Zero Trust"?

On Fri, Dec 26, 2025 at 05:53:58PM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote:
> >  the term "zero-trust" is a mess and some clear standards are in order.
> 
> That ship has sailed, the cow is out of the barn, etc. etc.

It's not just that term.  PKI, Kerberos, TLS, GSS, SASL, EAP, IPsec, SSH
-- these and others tend to use similar terms in different ways.  It's all a
mess.  We have a glossary, but it can't change all that, and nothing can.
IMO.

Nico
-- 

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]