[saag] Re: 回复: FW: Interests on Initiati ng the standardization work related to "Zero Trust"?

Hi Xueting and Aijun,


On 31.12.25 03:58, Xueting Li wrote:
> We warmly welcome your comments, suggestions, and involvement. Please feel free to share your feedback.

I appreciate that you warmly welcome further comments, but I kindly ask 
you to /warmly/ address them as well. How is it addressing my 
questions/concerns in [0]? In particular, see network infrastructure 
integrity [1].

Your goal seems to be "continuous, dynamic verification" which can be 
done by post-handshake attestation [2*].


Sec.8: I don't understand what performance overhead has got to do with 
security consideration?

References are missing important details, e.g., author names and links.

And why is it standards track?


-Usama


[0] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/5yJGI21NKtUz18jD-AQbF7pJdok/

[1] 
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mihalcea-seat-use-cases-00.html#section-3.3

[2*] 
https://tls-attestation.github.io/exported-attestation/draft-fossati-seat-expat.html


* Apologies for mentioning the editors' draft. We will roll out the 
updates in the corresponding draft early next year.

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]