[saag] Re: On path Active Attackers, and Meddlers in the M iddle
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.saag |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ME0P300MB071330D0E8C67003EBA86FA5EE122@ME0P300MB0713.AUSP300.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> |
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> writes: >Going with Jon's suggestion that we have Active *In*-Path ... Access? "AIP" >vs "AOP", but that omits the trailing "A" We have a well-established global cybercrime industry that relies on exploiting the gaps in things like TLS (phishing, spoofing, etc) to the point where it's pretty much irrelevant to the attackers whether TLS gets used or not. At the same time we have a thousand-message thread on whether it's appropriate to apply personal pronouns to inanimate objects in the middle. Perhaps we could just say Non-gender-or-race-specific-personal-pronoun-in-the- middle attack so we can get back to ignoring the real problems again. Peter. _______________________________________________ saag mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]