[saag] Re: draft update on discussion on crypto practices at IETF
Eric Rescorla <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.saag |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABcZeBNNcin7GrjNSP0j7T2zQjSAuUJeHUorTJbVPeZd_wF=wA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 1:39 PM Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hiya, > > On 22/01/2025 19:12, Paul Hoffman wrote: > >> We know what SEC does > > > > I disagree with that on a factual basis. In the last year, I have > > had at least three people express surprise that some Security Area > > registries allow Internet Drafts as references. > > There's a related (almost inverse) controversy as well: some > people assert that having a code-point associated with an I-D > means that no RFC ought later be produced. > Hmm... I don't think I've seen anybody assert that. Can you provide a reference? -Ekr _______________________________________________ saag mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]