[saag] Re: draft update on discussion on crypto practices at IETF

Eric Rescorla <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.saag
Message-ID <CABcZeBNNcin7GrjNSP0j7T2zQjSAuUJeHUorTJbVPeZd_wF=wA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 1:39 PM Stephen Farrell <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
> Hiya,
>
> On 22/01/2025 19:12, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> >> We know what SEC does
>  >
> > I disagree with that on a factual basis. In the last year, I have
> > had at least three people express surprise that some Security Area
> > registries allow Internet Drafts as references.
>
> There's a related (almost inverse) controversy as well: some
> people assert that having a code-point associated with an I-D
> means that no RFC ought later be produced.
>

Hmm... I don't think I've seen anybody assert that. Can you provide
a reference?

-Ekr

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.