[saag] Re: draft update on discussion on crypto practices at IETF

Carsten Bormann <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.saag
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 22. Jan 2025, at 22:38, Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> There's a related (almost inverse) controversy as well: some
> people assert that having a code-point associated with an I-D
> means that no RFC ought later be produced.

This whole discussion (referencing I-Ds as stable sources) is full of absurd arguments, but this one would be beating them all.
We generally update registries’ references when a document is replaced (e.g., a bis is approved).
Why would being referenced by a registry ever hinder the update/replacement of a document?

Grüße, Carsten

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.