[saag] Re: draft update on discussion on crypto practices at IETF
Carsten Bormann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.saag |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 22. Jan 2025, at 22:38, Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> wrote: > > There's a related (almost inverse) controversy as well: some > people assert that having a code-point associated with an I-D > means that no RFC ought later be produced. This whole discussion (referencing I-Ds as stable sources) is full of absurd arguments, but this one would be beating them all. We generally update registries’ references when a document is replaced (e.g., a bis is approved). Why would being referenced by a registry ever hinder the update/replacement of a document? Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ saag mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]