[saag] Re: draft-paulwh-crypto-components-02: DE's and I -D's
Carsten Bormann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.saag |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 18. Feb 2025, at 06:12, Martin Thomson <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2025, at 15:59, Carsten Bormann wrote: >> If a WG wants to set up a registry outlawing specifications that are >> captured in Internet-Drafts or that have been written on a Tuesday or >> in British English or whatever weird criteria the WG wants, that is >> fine. Declaring this a somehow unsolved issue with a dangling sword >> hanging above you serves no purpose. > > The greater service that this document could provide all of us is to answer the question definitively one way or other. Right. (Reading Section 4.6 of RFC 8126 already provides the answer, but I’m not going to belabor that point.) > Both-sides-ism sure is easy, but leaving that dangly sword swinging around might lead to someone getting hurt. All I was reacting to was the *creation* of such a sword implied by “Until…”. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ saag mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]