[saag] Re: draft-paulwh-crypto-components-02: DE's and I -D's

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 12:13 AM Martin Thomson <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 18, 2025, at 15:59, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> > If a WG wants to set up a registry outlawing specifications that are
> > captured in Internet-Drafts or that have been written on a Tuesday or
> > in British English or whatever weird criteria the WG wants, that is
> > fine.  Declaring this a somehow unsolved issue with a dangling sword
> > hanging above you serves no purpose.
>
> The greater service that this document could provide all of us is to
> answer the question definitively one way or other.  Both-sides-ism sure is
> easy, but leaving that dangly sword swinging around might lead to someone
> getting hurt.
>

I don't think this draft is the place to make that decision. I thought this
was going to IANABIS but perhaps it is another GEN AREA
issue. CC: Roman for visiblity.

I was told I should avoid pre-empting any discussion about "draft
considered stable for Specification Required" here.

Paul

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]