[saag] Re: draft-paulwh-crypto-components-02 ("one of th e reasons")

On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 2:58 PM Salz, Rich <rsalz=
[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks for your reply, it clarifies things.
>
>
>
> > The text helps me and future ADs to answer these questions in the same
> way for everyone, and helps to point out that AD sponsoring
>
> cryptographic algorithms is not the "current way" even if it has been done
> in the past.
>
>
>
> I don’t see any text that says or implies and the only mentions in 2.2
> says “may not be willing.”
>
>
>
> Here is a suggestion.  The IESG could have a page where individual AD’s
> report their interest in sponsoring drafts.
>

You mean generically or for specific drafts? I am confused what you want to
signal.

For SEC, in our SAAG slide deck we always list all drafts that are under
consideration or are being AD Sponsored.
Informal outreach obviously doesn't get added there.

Paul

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]