[saag] Re: On path Active Attackers, and Meddlers in the M iddle

I think this is a useful document. I think it is in a good state already. I don’t think the document should talk much about about active on-path defenses, except stating that what Alice considers to be an on-path attacker, Bob might consider to be an on-path defender.

John

From: Paul Wouters <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, 20 February 2025 at 02:46
To: Michael Richardson <[email protected]>
Cc: IETF SAAG <[email protected]>
Subject: [saag] Re: On path Active Attackers, and Meddlers in the Middle

It wasn't for me. The first message in the thread for me was Deb, and she was quoting but not with the original draft name.
I might have deleted the original first message, and the draft name appeared in no further messages in the thread.

Thanks,

Paul

On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 8:16 PM Michael Richardson <[email protected]<mailto:mcr%[email protected]>> wrote:

Michael Richardson <[email protected]<mailto:mcr%[email protected]>> wrote:
    > I've heard many bits of response about this draft, most seem supportive, with
    > one or two believing this is just some kind of virtue signaling.

The draft in question:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richardson-saag-onpath-attacker/

--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]<mailto:mcr%[email protected]>>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide




_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]