[saag] Re: Review of draft-paulwh-crypto-components-03

On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 8:42 PM Watson Ladd <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear SAAG,
>
> I am very confused by the draft vs. the rest of the conversations
> we've had about it, and crypto in general. I think the draft needs to
> take a sharper line to get the message across clearly that you don't
> need an RFC to use a new primitive in an IETF protocol, just a
> registration and should explain the reasons why a document might still
> be useful/what working groups should consider doing themselves.


I would be happy to see this, as I think it is a key point of the document.
Do you believe
adding a sentence into the Abstract or Introduction could address your
point?



> It also seems to imply you can do protocols that use cryptography without
> thinking about cryptography


What text makes you think this?

 Paul

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]