[saag] Re: Time for some errata handling !

Paul Wouters <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.saag
Message-ID <CAGL5yWax7w4dOB8_Cog1hAHJBOEiR4qEUpSW+0sMNZZHxL3oJg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 1:35 PM StJohns, Michael <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Paul - a while back the AD created a google doc with the open errata and
> we edited that.  Perhaps that would work this time rather than spamming
> various groups?
>

That would work  too, but the spreadsheet was very difficult to contain
longer descriptions to be used for the actual errata fileing by the AD.

Paul


>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 12:00 Paul Wouters <paul.wouters=
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 11:20 AM Salz, Rich <rsalz=
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> we have 203 open errata. Please look at some in your area of expertise
>>> and help your ADs verifying / closing some of these.
>>>
>>
>> Either here or on the related WG email list. Errata can be lumped
>> together, but if the reason is not 110% obvious, please do explain why you
>> reached a conclusion. If one of the ADs just sees a list of "hold for
>> document update", "verified", "rejected" - it is hard for us to act on as
>> we then still need to understand the process that reached this conclusion.
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> How to do that – post email here?  One/errata, or group a bunch in one
>>> message?
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> saag mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>
>

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.