[saag] Re: Time for some errata handling !

So one errata per message then?
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 14:03 Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 1:35 PM StJohns, Michael <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Paul - a while back the AD created a google doc with the open errata and
>> we edited that.  Perhaps that would work this time rather than spamming
>> various groups?
>>
>
> That would work  too, but the spreadsheet was very difficult to contain
> longer descriptions to be used for the actual errata fileing by the AD.
>
> Paul
>
>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 12:00 Paul Wouters <paul.wouters=
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 11:20 AM Salz, Rich <rsalz=
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> we have 203 open errata. Please look at some in your area of expertise
>>>> and help your ADs verifying / closing some of these.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Either here or on the related WG email list. Errata can be lumped
>>> together, but if the reason is not 110% obvious, please do explain why you
>>> reached a conclusion. If one of the ADs just sees a list of "hold for
>>> document update", "verified", "rejected" - it is hard for us to act on as
>>> we then still need to understand the process that reached this conclusion.
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How to do that – post email here?  One/errata, or group a bunch in one
>>>> message?
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> saag mailing list -- [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>>
>>

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]