sasl in beep or payload...
Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> Wed, 12 Dec 2001 21:43:58 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sacred |
|---|---|
| Organization | Baltimore Technologies Ltd. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all, At the meeting today we had a fairly extensive discussion about the recent thread on transport issues (more on that in the minutes). This mail (I hope:-) describes one result of that discussion, for confirmation on the list. Around 15 hands were raised in response to the question: "how many are likely to implement sacred". Of those, all but one agreed with the proposition that we should include the sasl PDUs in the sacred payload. So, the concensus at the meeting is to add new messages along the lines of the bind request and response from Magnus' posting. If there are enough people unhappy with this, I'll start a straw poll on the list in a few days so we can sort it out. Regards, Stephen. Note: this doesn't address the beep/http issue and has nothing to do with port 80 - I'll send a separate mail on that. -- ____________________________________________________________ Stephen Farrell Baltimore Technologies, tel: (direct line) +353 1 881 6716 39 Parkgate Street, fax: +353 1 881 7000 Dublin 8. mailto:[email protected] Ireland http://www.baltimore.com