sasl in beep or payload...

Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> Wed, 12 Dec 2001 21:43:58 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sacred
Organization Baltimore Technologies Ltd.
Message-ID <[email protected]>

Hi all,

At the meeting today we had a fairly extensive discussion about 
the recent thread on transport issues (more on that in the 
minutes). This mail (I hope:-) describes one result of that 
discussion, for confirmation on the list.

Around 15 hands were raised in response to the question: "how
many are likely to implement sacred". Of those, all but one 
agreed with the proposition that we should include the sasl 
PDUs in the sacred payload. So, the concensus at the meeting
is to add new messages along the lines of the bind request
and response from Magnus' posting.

If there are enough people unhappy with this, I'll start a 
straw poll on the list in a few days so we can sort it out.

Regards,
Stephen.

Note: this doesn't address the beep/http issue and has nothing
to do with port 80 - I'll send a separate mail on that.


-- 
____________________________________________________________
Stephen Farrell         				   
Baltimore Technologies,   tel: (direct line) +353 1 881 6716
39 Parkgate Street,                     fax: +353 1 881 7000
Dublin 8.                mailto:[email protected]
Ireland                             http://www.baltimore.com