Re: protocol progress (again!)
Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Jun 2002 15:43:02 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sacred |
|---|---|
| Organization | Baltimore Technologies Ltd. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all, I think we've had sufficient time on this. The results I counted are below, and while I would have liked to see some more opinions it seems we've a fairly clear concensus on option C. So, I'll try to start work on the next protocol draft reflecting this next week. Regards, Stephen. A: Do nothing option. - B: Quit option. - C: Easier process option. Marshall Rose <[email protected]> Al Arsenault <[email protected]> Menno Pieters <[email protected]> Abbie Barbir <[email protected]> Dale Gustafson <[email protected]> Gareth Richards <[email protected]> Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> Christopher A. Martin <[email protected]> D: As we are (incl. SASL-SRP) option. Tom Wu <[email protected]> -- ____________________________________________________________ Stephen Farrell Baltimore Technologies, tel: (direct line) +353 1 881 6716 39 Parkgate Street, fax: +353 1 881 7000 Dublin 8. mailto:[email protected] Ireland http://www.baltimore.com