Re: protocol progress (again!)

Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Jun 2002 15:43:02 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sacred
Organization Baltimore Technologies Ltd.
Message-ID <[email protected]>

Hi all,

I think we've had sufficient time on this. The results I counted
are below, and while I would have liked to see some more opinions
it seems we've a fairly clear concensus on option C. So, I'll try
to start work on the next protocol draft reflecting this next
week.

Regards,
Stephen.


A: Do nothing option.

- 

B: Quit option.

-

C: Easier process option.

Marshall Rose <[email protected]>
Al Arsenault <[email protected]>
Menno Pieters <[email protected]>
Abbie Barbir <[email protected]>
Dale Gustafson <[email protected]>
Gareth Richards <[email protected]>
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]>
Christopher A. Martin <[email protected]>

D: As we are (incl. SASL-SRP) option.

Tom Wu <[email protected]>

-- 
____________________________________________________________
Stephen Farrell         				   
Baltimore Technologies,   tel: (direct line) +353 1 881 6716
39 Parkgate Street,                     fax: +353 1 881 7000
Dublin 8.                mailto:[email protected]
Ireland                             http://www.baltimore.com