Re: Where this fits in

Graham,


I'm well behind in getting to my messages.... Sorry for the delay.


At 11:36 AM 5/27/99 +0100, you wrote:

>At 22:26 26/05/99 -0700, you wrote:

>>Our view of the world is that SCMP could be used to move many of these

>>messages around.

>

>Are you receptive to the idea that SCMP could be developed to also

>accommodate non-commerce messages?

>


Yes. SCMP can be used as a generalized, non-commerce messaging protocol. This is an extension that we'd welcome and fully support. It just so happens that we work in the commerce business and feel comfortable on the use of the protocol for commerce messaging. 


>If you feel that this broadening of scope is appropriate, I would be

>pleased to lend my support to moving this activity towards the standards

>track.  The application that currently interests me is "trusted faxing" via

>the Internet (and possibly other media).



> [ rest snipped ]

Thomas A. Arnold

Vice President of Engineering

Chief Technical Officer

CyberSource Corporation

[email protected]

http://www.cybersource.com/

----------------------------------------------------

This Email and any attached files are confidential and may also be
privileged. <bold><italic> </italic></bold>It is intended only for the
individual or entity to whom it is addressed.  If you are not the
recipient or an authorized agent of the recipient, you are hereby
notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this message
in error, please contact CyberSource Corporation immediately at (408)
556-9100.  Thank you.