Re: SCMP Informational Draft?

Jason Eaton wrote:

> 2) Make SCMP an informational draft
>
>   Cons: ?
>   Pros: Draft would reflect real implementation.

I believe that this is the best approach: first put out an Informational RFC
on the current SCMP, then start work on a new version.  The Informational
RFC will let people know the current protocol, so they can interoperate with
it if they want, and will also give a basis for future work.  The new
version will be the one that sees the benefit of getting broad-based input.

--
/=============================================================\
|John Stracke    | My opinions are my own | S/MIME & HTML OK  |
|[email protected]|============================================|
|Chief Scientist | NT's lack of reliability is only surpassed |
|eCal Corp.      |  by its lack of scalability. -- John Kirch |
\=============================================================/