Re: CTP Issue17: Clarifying text needed on deployment restrictions

"James Kempf" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.seamoby
Message-ID <00c301c34c2b$d49e1360$566015ac@dclkempt40>
Agree.

            jak

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:14 AM
Subject: CTP Issue17: Clarifying text needed on deployment restrictions 


> Hi all,
> 
> I've marked this as possible reject, the text is as follows:
> 
> Small clarification may be in order, but as this is 
> experimental, discussing 'ct within one ISP' isn't really 
> applicable.
> 
> But regardless of that, I think it's important (and I think 
> you'll probably agree) to at least try to paint some 
> picture about deployment restrictions very early (in 
> abstract, special section or introduction), so people don't 
> have too many fantastic notions about the applicability 
> (and when starting to read the document, think like "what 
> are these guys doing?  you can't solve the generic problem 
> with this".
> 
> So, personally I think it might be a good idea to focus 
> first *with sufficiently verbose text early on* on 
> the "context transfer inside one ISP" -problem, and see 
> whether it gives you sufficient sufficient benefits
> and the protocol can be deployed.
> 
> 
> John
> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.