Re: CTP Issue17: Clarifying text needed on deployment restrictions
"James Kempf" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.seamoby |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <00c301c34c2b$d49e1360$566015ac@dclkempt40> |
Agree.
jak
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:14 AM
Subject: CTP Issue17: Clarifying text needed on deployment restrictions
> Hi all,
>
> I've marked this as possible reject, the text is as follows:
>
> Small clarification may be in order, but as this is
> experimental, discussing 'ct within one ISP' isn't really
> applicable.
>
> But regardless of that, I think it's important (and I think
> you'll probably agree) to at least try to paint some
> picture about deployment restrictions very early (in
> abstract, special section or introduction), so people don't
> have too many fantastic notions about the applicability
> (and when starting to read the document, think like "what
> are these guys doing? you can't solve the generic problem
> with this".
>
> So, personally I think it might be a good idea to focus
> first *with sufficiently verbose text early on* on
> the "context transfer inside one ISP" -problem, and see
> whether it gives you sufficient sufficient benefits
> and the protocol can be deployed.
>
>
> John
>
>