Re: CTP Issue20: How to identify MN's with private addresses
"James Kempf" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.seamoby |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <00e601c34c2d$6e0beb20$566015ac@dclkempt40> |
Agree.
jak
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:18 AM
Subject: CTP Issue20: How to identify MN's with private addresses
> Hi all,
>
> I've marked this as a possible reject, the text is as follows:
>
> msg31 Author: jloughney Date: 2003-07-17.06:17:41
> I think for experimental, we sould focus on the optimistic
> cases. This issue needs to be resolved before becoming a
> standards track doc.
>
>
> msg21 Author: jloughney Date: 2003-06-27.12:17:46
> Section 2.4
> a. "The Mobile Node, for which context transfer protocol
> operations are undertaken, is always identified by its
> previous IP access address." - Is uniqueness of the address
> at the previous AR guaranteed? For example in the case of
> Mobile IPv4, MNs which have private addresses may use the
> FA advertised CoA and reverse tunnel to the HA. In that
> case there could be multiple MNs with the same IP address
> (HoA). The FA is able to differentiate
>
> John
>
>