Re: CTP Issue20: How to identify MN's with private addresses

"James Kempf" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.seamoby
Message-ID <00e601c34c2d$6e0beb20$566015ac@dclkempt40>
Agree.

        jak

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:18 AM
Subject: CTP Issue20: How to identify MN's with private addresses


> Hi all,
> 
> I've marked this as a possible reject, the text is as follows:
> 
> msg31 Author: jloughney Date: 2003-07-17.06:17:41 
> I think for experimental, we sould focus on the optimistic 
> cases.  This issue needs to be resolved before becoming a 
> standards track doc.
> 
>  
> msg21 Author: jloughney Date: 2003-06-27.12:17:46 
> Section 2.4
>    a. "The Mobile Node, for which context transfer protocol 
> operations are undertaken, is always identified by its 
> previous IP access address." - Is uniqueness of the address 
> at the previous AR guaranteed? For example in the case of 
> Mobile IPv4, MNs which have private addresses may use the 
> FA advertised CoA and reverse tunnel to the HA. In that 
> case there could be multiple MNs with the same IP address
> (HoA). The FA is able to differentiate 
>  
> John
> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.