CTP Issue 12: Use of MN's new care-of address

"James Kempf" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.seamoby
Message-ID <01ff01c37c77$86e96120$956015ac@dclkempt40> 
If MN's new care-of address is included in CTAR or CTD
before it is assigned on the MN, nAR must defend new CoA
(at least for IPv6 DAD) until MN claims it.  Should this
requirement be stated?  Or can the new CoA only be used in
CTAR or CTD if it is already assigned to the MN?  If so,
then it should be clearly stated.
See http://danforsberg.info:8080/draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp/issue12 for
details.Suggested resolution: Include text noting that the new AR must
defend the address using proxy ARP/ND.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.