Re: A Question about L2 ID .....

I have concerns on the fact that par. 5.1.3.1 defines the "L2 type" 
and "L2 ID" fields as a L2 general ID (with unassigned values and 
prefixes).

The fixed-length EUI-64 is used as a global identifier in a number of 
the format prefixes Interface IDs (including IEEE802).

Why using what haven't been already defined when something else has 
been defined and registered?

Simone

>It's the MAC address.
>
>         jak
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Ivano De Luca" <[email protected]>
>To: <[email protected]>
>Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 3:18 AM
>Subject: [Seamoby] A Question about L2 ID .....
>
>
>>  Hello,
>>  One question for you.
>>  Which is exactly the ID at L2 that MN listen to make handover decisions?
>>  Is it the ESSID of AP? Or is it the MAC Address? Or other?
>>
>>  I've understood that it is the ESSID, but it is not the one by
>>  definition....
>>  If there are some APs in MN's range with the same name, what happens?
>>
>>  Ivano
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  Seamoby mailing list
>>  [email protected]
>>  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Seamoby mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby