Re: A Question about L2 ID .....

The CARD protocol should be able to operate on any kind of (wireless) L2
technologies including their various MAC/link address formats.
So the CARD protocol does not assume any single format for MAC/link
addresses.
Hope this answers your question.

Eunsoo

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Simone Molendini" <[email protected]>
To: "James Kempf" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Seamoby] A Question about L2 ID .....


> I have concerns on the fact that par. 5.1.3.1 defines the "L2 type"
> and "L2 ID" fields as a L2 general ID (with unassigned values and
> prefixes).
>
> The fixed-length EUI-64 is used as a global identifier in a number of
> the format prefixes Interface IDs (including IEEE802).
>
> Why using what haven't been already defined when something else has
> been defined and registered?
>
> Simone
>
> >It's the MAC address.
> >
> >         jak
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Ivano De Luca" <[email protected]>
> >To: <[email protected]>
> >Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 3:18 AM
> >Subject: [Seamoby] A Question about L2 ID .....
> >
> >
> >>  Hello,
> >>  One question for you.
> >>  Which is exactly the ID at L2 that MN listen to make handover
decisions?
> >>  Is it the ESSID of AP? Or is it the MAC Address? Or other?
> >>
> >>  I've understood that it is the ESSID, but it is not the one by
> >>  definition....
> >>  If there are some APs in MN's range with the same name, what happens?
> >>
> >>  Ivano
> >>
> >>
> >>  _______________________________________________
> >>  Seamoby mailing list
> >>  [email protected]
> >>  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
> >>
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Seamoby mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Seamoby mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
>