RE: few comments on CTP 04
[email protected] Fri, 24 Oct 2003 18:05:04 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.seamoby |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Julian, I thought I replied earlier to this, but I guess I did not. > after a quick review, these are my questions/comments concerning > ctp-04.. > > 1. p4. 3 § > > We call such an event as a Context Transfer Trigger > > -> We call such en event a Context Transfer Trigger Actually, it should be: We call such an event a Context Transfer Trigger > 2. In the second scenario, nAR may itself generates a Context Transfer > Request as a response to an internal trigger. > > The problem is that nAR "must" supply, the MN's previous IP address, the > feature contexts to be transferred and a token authorizing the transfer. > > So, I guess that either we offer a way to the nAR to retrieve this info > from MN or the nAR can't generate a Context Transfer as a response to an > internal trigger. > > Do I miss something ? I've removed the internal trigger part of the text, as you correctly noted it would not be possible for the nAR to have the address of the previous IP address. > 3. At the last paragraph p5. we have "[1].* contexts ...the [2]algorithm[3]" Got it. > 4. In § 2.3 Context Data Block, it is written: > > "The Cxt-Type indicates the type of the feature context messages itself > (such as QoS Context Request, Qos Context Transfer etc,).." > > can't it be deduce from CTAR/CTD/CTR ? I think it wise to be explicit here. > 5. In § 2.4.1 Context Transfer Activate Request > > While a MN sends a CTAR to pAR, the MN includes the nAR's address and its new IP address (if known). > If these addresses are not known, what does MN include ? (his previous IP > address or 0.0.0.0/0::0 ?) The previous IP address. > 6. I can't find "Context Transfer Framework for Seamless Mobility" :-( > > Hope it helps :-) It is expired, we need to remove it from the references. Thanks for the comments, John