RE: [issue30] How to handle bad MN's authorization Toke n?
Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1 <[email protected]> Tue, 2 Dec 2003 16:52:10 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.seamoby |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
John, Are you soliciting opinions on these alternatives as well? Madjid -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of John Loughney SEAMOBY-Issues Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 2:55 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Seamoby] [issue30] How to handle bad MN's authorization Token? New submission from John Loughney <[email protected]>: In case nAR requests the transfer by a CTR message, the pAR must verify the MN's authorization token. If this token is unvalid, what do we do ? Possible solutions: - nothing ? the pAR does not answer to nAR. - pAR indicates the error to nAR: * In the CTD message. * In a error message which could carry error information. others ? ---------- category: Editorial document: draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp-05.txt messages: 39 nosy: jloughney priority: Should Fix status: No Discussion title: How to handle bad MN's authorization Token? _____________________________________________________________ Seamoby CTP Issues <[email protected]> <http://danforsberg.info:8080/draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp/issue30> _____________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby