Re: [issue30] How to handle bad MN's authorization Token?

John Loughney SEAMOBY-Issues wrote:

> New submission from John Loughney <[email protected]>:
>
> In case nAR requests the transfer by a CTR message, the pAR must verify
> the MN's authorization token. If this token is unvalid, what do we do ?
>
> Possible solutions:
>
>  - nothing ? the pAR does not answer to nAR.
>  - pAR indicates the error to nAR:
>         * In the CTD message.
>         * In a error message which could carry error information.
>

pAR MUST respond to nAR with an appropriate error.
nAR SHOULD convey the result to the MN.

-Rajeev


>
> others ?
>
> ----------
> category: Editorial
> document: draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp-05.txt
> messages: 39
> nosy: jloughney
> priority: Should Fix
> status: No Discussion
> title: How to handle bad MN's authorization Token?
> _____________________________________________________________
> Seamoby CTP Issues <[email protected]>
> <http://danforsberg.info:8080/draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp/issue30>
> _____________________________________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> Seamoby mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby