Re: [issue30] How to handle bad MN's authorization Token?

Hi,

On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 11:13:50AM -0800, Rajeev Koodli wrote:
> John Loughney SEAMOBY-Issues wrote:
> 
> > New submission from John Loughney <[email protected]>:
> >
> > In case nAR requests the transfer by a CTR message, the pAR must verify
> > the MN's authorization token. If this token is unvalid, what do we do ?
> >
> > Possible solutions:
> >
> >  - nothing ? the pAR does not answer to nAR.
> >  - pAR indicates the error to nAR:
> >         * In the CTD message.
> >         * In a error message which could carry error information.
> >
> 
> pAR MUST respond to nAR with an appropriate error.
> nAR SHOULD convey the result to the MN.

I agree with that but how to carry this error ? In the CTD message or do
we create a new message to carry error ?

thanks,


> 
> -Rajeev
> 
> 
> >
> > others ?
> >
> > ----------
> > category: Editorial
> > document: draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp-05.txt
> > messages: 39
> > nosy: jloughney
> > priority: Should Fix
> > status: No Discussion
> > title: How to handle bad MN's authorization Token?
> > _____________________________________________________________
> > Seamoby CTP Issues <[email protected]>
> > <http://danforsberg.info:8080/draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp/issue30>
> > _____________________________________________________________
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Seamoby mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Seamoby mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
> 

-- 
[email protected]