Re: DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP

"James Kempf" <[email protected]> Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:33:20 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.seamoby
Message-ID <074401c3f823$12870c10$936015ac@dclkempt40>
Sounds fine.

I'll write up the changes and send them to Allison.

            jak

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rajeev Koodli" <[email protected]>
To: "James Kempf" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Raghu" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP


> James Kempf wrote:
>
> > > Also I suggest that the field "Previous (New) Router IP Address"
> > > be revised to "Previous (New) Router IPv4 Address"
> > >
> >
> > What happens is the router only has an IPv6 address?
> >
>
> I hope that will be the case one day!
>
> >
> > How about:
> >
> >     Previous (New) Router IP address, or, in the case of dual stack
routers,
> > IPv4 address.
> >
>
> We could state the default is IPv4 unless no IPv4 support is available.
> That is, simply re-word above as PAR (NAR) IP Address, default
> being IPv4.
>
> -Rajeev
>
>
> >
> >                 jak
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Seamoby mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
>
>