Re: Review Period Reminder

"James Kempf" <[email protected]> Tue, 4 May 2004 09:31:05 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.seamoby
Message-ID <[email protected]>
John,

>1) Status of this memo section needs to be updated with new boilerplate.

OK. Where is this?

> 2) Abstract margins need fixing.

OK.

> 3) Needs IPR text

My understanding is that IPR text isn't needed unless there are IPR
considerations. As this document is purely instructions to IANA, there
aren't.

> 4) Is this a protocol document or a information document? If it is
>   info, then probably keywords (MUST; SHOULD; MAY, etc) shouldn't
>   be used.

I'll ask Allison. I've heard two stories on this, one that an informational
or experimental document may have such normative text and others that it
shouldn't. The doc is really just informational.

> 5) Section 5.2 - are these all of the possible L2

No, there are possibly more, which is why the registry is being established.
For example, 802.16 might be a possibility in the future. And there might be
others in the future. Was there something you thing needed changing here?

            jak