Re: Review Period Reminder

Hi John,

Previous comments in another email, continuing...

>6) Section 6.0 - is MLD the only current context profile type?  Shouldn't
 >  we also allocate one for header compression as that is being specified?

I'm a little reluctant to step into that political minefield, especially
since there is not yet an RFC track draft with a header compression context
defined in it. I've seen an individual draft, but I don't know whether the
authors are intending to submit it for publication, and there is as yet no
WG draft in the ROHC group. I'll ask Allison.

>7) Section 7.0 says:
>
>     The Seamoby Working Group requests that IANA maintain allocations for
the
>     port number and ICMP message type number for a minimum of 3 years
after
>     which the allocations SHOULD be released, unless the Seamoby protocols
are
>     advanced in some form to Proposed Standard.
>
>   Three years from what date? Publication of this draft, from publication
as RFC?

Good point. I think 3 years from publication of the draft.

            jak