Re: Support for ECDSA and SHA-2 (SHA-256) in the SSHFP record
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.secsh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 5. 9. 2011, at 13:12, Ben Laurie wrote: > On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> But the question is - is it worth updating in this particular I-D? Isn't >> this more an errata for RFC4255 type of update? > > Yes. Yes what? :) Yes to update it in ECDSA I-D? or Yes to do an errata / bis of RFC4255? O. -- Ondřej Surý vedoucí výzkumu/Head of R&D department ------------------------------------------- CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o. -- Laboratoře CZ.NIC Americka 23, 120 00 Praha 2, Czech Republic mailto:[email protected] http://nic.cz/ tel:+420.222745110 fax:+420.222745112 -------------------------------------------