Re: Support for ECDSA and SHA-2 (SHA-256) in the SSHFP record
Ben Laurie <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.secsh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAG5KPzxwn1TiB=kfsx6ABVOJeGf3JcKv7q5PjSnFrQQw8kA0RA@mail.gmail.com> |
2011/9/5 Ondřej Surý <[email protected]>: > > On 5. 9. 2011, at 13:12, Ben Laurie wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> But the question is - is it worth updating in this particular I-D? Isn't >>> this more an errata for RFC4255 type of update? >> >> Yes. > > > Yes what? :) > > Yes to update it in ECDSA I-D? > > or > > Yes to do an errata / bis of RFC4255? The latter.