Re: [Ssh] draft charter

--0000000000002005f3061f997c51
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hm.  The [email protected] list was used by the original secsh working
group and has served as a forum for ongoing (if quite low-volume)
discussion since then. Why not reuse it, instead of setting up a new list?

The scope of a maintenance group like this should include discussion and
evaluation of proposed extensions and revisions. Of course, actually
working on any such proposal would require a charter revision, but IMHO it
should be clear that this group is the right place for such discussions.

-- Jeff

On Tue, Aug 13, 2024, 18:38 Stephen Farrell <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
> Thanks Deb,
>
> On 13/08/2024 23:24, Deb Cooley wrote:
> >
> > Or for more information see here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/sshm/about/
>
> As you'll have seen if you went to that web page, Deb
> and Paul have asked Job Snijders and I to help out doing
> a bit of chairing whenever this WG is officially setup.
> We're happy to try help out that way.
>
> If anyone has any questions about IETF process or anything
> else relevant, feel free to just mail the list, or if you
> prefer, you could send off-list mail to Job and I.
>
> Meanwhile, comments on the draft charter, [1] as Deb said,
> would be good to get in the immediate future. If you think
> that text is good enough, getting a few "looks good to me"
> mails sent to the list could also be useful for people
> involved in approving the formation of the WG.
>
> Cheers,
> S.
>
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-sshm/
>
>

--0000000000002005f3061f997c51
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"auto">Hm.=C2=A0 The=C2=A0<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]"=
>[email protected]</a>=C2=A0list was used by the original secsh working g=
roup and has served as a forum for ongoing (if quite low-volume) discussion=
 since then. Why not reuse it, instead of setting up a new list?=C2=A0<div =
dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">The scope of a maintenance group l=
ike this should include discussion and evaluation of proposed extensions an=
d revisions. Of course, actually working on any such proposal would require=
 a charter revision, but IMHO it should be clear that this group is the rig=
ht place for such discussions.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D=
"auto">-- Jeff</div></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" c=
lass=3D"gmail_attr">On Tue, Aug 13, 2024, 18:38 Stephen Farrell &lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&gt; wro=
te:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px =
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br>
Thanks Deb,<br>
<br>
On 13/08/2024 23:24, Deb Cooley wrote:<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Or for more information see here:<br>
&gt; <a href=3D"https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/sshm/about/" rel=3D"norefer=
rer noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/sshm/abou=
t/</a><br>
<br>
As you&#39;ll have seen if you went to that web page, Deb<br>
and Paul have asked Job Snijders and I to help out doing<br>
a bit of chairing whenever this WG is officially setup.<br>
We&#39;re happy to try help out that way.<br>
<br>
If anyone has any questions about IETF process or anything<br>
else relevant, feel free to just mail the list, or if you<br>
prefer, you could send off-list mail to Job and I.<br>
<br>
Meanwhile, comments on the draft charter, [1] as Deb said,<br>
would be good to get in the immediate future. If you think<br>
that text is good enough, getting a few &quot;looks good to me&quot;<br>
mails sent to the list could also be useful for people<br>
involved in approving the formation of the WG.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
S.<br>
<br>
[1] <a href=3D"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-sshm/" rel=3D"=
noreferrer noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/c=
harter-ietf-sshm/</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>

--0000000000002005f3061f997c51--