RE: Does anybody success with building encrypted enveloped mail that can be open and read in Outlook Express by SFL library?

"Colestock, Robert" <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Oct 2001 11:15:14 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sfl
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Wooce:
 
I created that message, and I no longer have the necessary private keys to
open it.  I create such messages for 1-time tests.  I would suggest that you
create a private key set in MS Outlook/Express through one of the
established providers (e.g. Verisign, Thawt?) and create your own message.
You can use our CertificateBuilder utility, but it is a complicated process
(read the various readme files in the ./SMIME/CertifiateBuilder directory).
The CertificateBuilder PKCS12 files can be imported directly into MS
Outlook/Express. 
 
I believe tuzi was finally able to process messages; the difficulty is in
getting the precise details on the older MS Outlook/Express.  Our SFL
library is perhaps too flexible with its choices.  Also, the certifiates
must be very precise; the SFL test certificates are sloppy on many of the
details that MS Outlook/Express (and other applications) require.  ALL OF
THE TEST components are meant for Unit Development Testing ONLY.  Sorry.
See the comments in ./SMIME/CertificateBuilder/readme*.
 
Bob Colestock
VDA.

-----Original Message-----
From: wooce [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 5:42 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Does anybody success with building encrypted enveloped mail that
can be open and read in Outlook Express by SFL library?


hi,  
   I see  there is a  "EncryptedSMIME.eml"   in   the path
SMIME\testutil\mimetest2\   of the downloaded SFL library,  but  
I don't have the certificate  to  see this  .eml file in outlook express.
And I see an article by tuzi  who say that he can't  open 
the encrypted mail   made by the SFL library.     So I  want to  know about
whether anybody success in it  or   who  can tell 
me about  where I can find the certicifate  to open the  EncryptedSMIME.eml
contained in the SFL package.    I would thank  
greatly  for  it will avoid the  risk in development.  
 
 sincerely, 
 Wooce,  
[email protected]