Re: M3UA: Synchronizing DPC availability state between ASPs in the same AS
Dan Gora <[email protected]> Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:00:12 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGyogRZvaPevoocFE52NzW-6sL_Zhx9UkHe005V_LtrQs3+GKA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> wrote: > Dan, > > Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: (Mon, 10 Apr 2017 13:41:19) >> >> So, yes and no, you may have to correlate the receipt of >> DUNA, DAVA, DRST, SCON at any ASP across all ASPs active >> for the AS (if the SG does not broadcast); however, you >> should never have to do so in response to DAUD. >> > > See, for example, RFC 4666/5.4 Auditing Examples. You > will see that all transactions are between ASP and SGP, > not between AS and SG. Right... This is what led me to believe that we didn't have to synchronize the DPC states (and various conversions on the mailing list), but then again your description of considering ASPs in the same AS connected to the same SG as links in a linkset is what made be think that yes, we do need to synchronize the DPC states. However, this customer's SG seems to be even worse in that it's replying to a DAUD from ASP2 with a DAVA/DUNA to ASP1, _not_ ASP2 (or so they say, we still haven't been provided with traces or debug logs yet..). That just seems broken to me.. If we have to "fix" this, it seems like it should be safe to synchronize the states across all the active ASPs. I cannot think of a scenario where a DPC would be available in ASP 1 via SG1, but not via ASP2 as long as both are connected and ASP-Active with the SG1 since the SG1 has to synchronize it's state among all the SGPs in the SG. Right? thanks dan