RE: Congestion in M3UA/SUA and the use of the SCON

"Haresign Lincoln" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <849535E338E99741B7F7413F73253EDB024A05FD@us-nj-mail1.comverse.com>
Brian,

With regards to SUA, I believe you might be mistaken.  There is no
requirement to have a point code in the message recevied by SUA.  The
message received will have a called and calling address.  These
addresses could be global titles with no point code.

So again, if the ASP wants to indicate congestion back to the GW, it has
no way to specify the affected PC.

Regards,
Lincoln

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 2:00 PM
To: Haresign Lincoln
Cc: Tolga Asveren; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Congestion in M3UA/SUA and the use of the SCON

Lincoln,

Haresign Lincoln wrote:
(Fri, 07 Oct 2005 09:03:57)
> 
> The SUA layer at the ASP also has immediately at its disposal all the 
> addresses necessary to complete the mandatory address fields in the 
> SCON.
> 
> [lincoln]: It doesn't.  The SUA layer only knows source address which 
> may be a GT.

Yes it does, both for M3UA and SUA they are contained in the message
that triggered congestion.

--brian

--
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/

______________________________________________________________________
  This email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-Secure and has
been found clean.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.