RE: Congestion in M3UA/SUA and the use of the SCON
"Haresign Lincoln" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <849535E338E99741B7F7413F73253EDB024A05FD@us-nj-mail1.comverse.com> |
Brian, With regards to SUA, I believe you might be mistaken. There is no requirement to have a point code in the message recevied by SUA. The message received will have a called and calling address. These addresses could be global titles with no point code. So again, if the ASP wants to indicate congestion back to the GW, it has no way to specify the affected PC. Regards, Lincoln -----Original Message----- From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 2:00 PM To: Haresign Lincoln Cc: Tolga Asveren; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Congestion in M3UA/SUA and the use of the SCON Lincoln, Haresign Lincoln wrote: (Fri, 07 Oct 2005 09:03:57) > > The SUA layer at the ASP also has immediately at its disposal all the > addresses necessary to complete the mandatory address fields in the > SCON. > > [lincoln]: It doesn't. The SUA layer only knows source address which > may be a GT. Yes it does, both for M3UA and SUA they are contained in the message that triggered congestion. --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/ ______________________________________________________________________ This email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-Secure and has been found clean.