RE: Congestion in M3UA/SUA and the use of the SCON

Brian,

If I'm reading the SUA RFC correctly (section 3.10.2), there is no
requirement to put the DPC in the address when using GT.  There are a
variety of other scenarios also where no PC is required.

Regards,
Lincoln


-----Original Message-----
From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 1:58 PM
To: Haresign Lincoln
Cc: Tolga Asveren; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Congestion in M3UA/SUA and the use of the SCON

Lincoln,

Again: The SG places the DPC in every CL message it sends to the ASP.
When a message triggers congestion at the ASP, copy this address to the
SCON.  The ASP is capable of doing that.  They are mandatory.  This was
discussed before, check the archives.

As regards concerned addresses, knowing which concerned addresses to
notify is a responsibility of the SCCP layer at the SG, not the
responsibility of the SUA shim at the ASP.  Congestion might occur at
the SUA shim at the ASP, but large quantities of essenstial SCCP
configuration data should certainly not be stored there.  They are not
included.  This was discussed before, check the archives.

--brian

--
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/