RE: Congestion in M3UA/SUA and the use of the SCON
"Haresign Lincoln" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <849535E338E99741B7F7413F73253EDB024FA00C@us-nj-mail1.comverse.com> |
Brian,
The result of the GTT is a point code/SSN. However this information
does not need to be forwarded to the ASP in the address field. A CLDT
message can arrive at the ASP with _NO_ DPC in the message anywhere.
Please refer to the defintion for source address in section 3.10.2:
- Global Title (e.g., E.164 number) + optional PC and/or SSN, SSN
may be zero, when routing is done on Global Title
- SSN (non-zero) + optional PC and/or Global Title, when routing is
done on PC + SSN. The PC is mandatory in the source address when
sending from SGP to ASP, and in the destination address when
sending from ASP to SGP to reach the SS7 SEP.
- Hostname + optional SSN, when routing is done by Hostname
- SSN (non-zero) and optional IP address (IPv4 or IPv6) when routing
is done on IP address + SSN
It is _NOT_ required that the SG provide the PC/SSN in a CLDT message.
Therefore, if the ASP wants to implement the OPTIONAL SCON procedure,
and it is working with global titles, we need to modify the SCON message
requirements.
Regards,
Lincoln
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 5:19 PM
To: Haresign Lincoln
Cc: Tolga Asveren; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Congestion in M3UA/SUA and the use of the SCON
Haresign,
Haresign Lincoln wrote:
(Mon, 10 Oct 2005 14:43:29)
> Brian,
>
> Perhaps you were not aware, but additional GTT can also take place at
> an endpoint.
Yes, and the result of GTT is a point code.
> Many STPs will do GTT and they can allow further GTT to take place at
> the final destination (the signalling end point).
And to send the message to that end point requires a point code.
> In this
> case, it will arrive at an SG with a GTT in the called and calling
> address.
If there is no point code in the called address, it is taken from the
DPC of the MTP label. SUA does not have an MTP label so this
information is included in the Called Address for SUA.
> The SG is not required to (and probably shouldn't) convert the called
> address to a PC/SSN.
For ASP operation it does. SUA SG-ASP transport the SCCP-SCCP User
interface (see the RFC). See Q.711. CL and CREF are always delivered
to the SCCP User with a MTP-SAP (point code and SI value).
> So a CLDT may arrive at the ASP with JUST a GT in the called address.
No. There are some cases in Q.711 CO where the Responding Address can
differ from the Called Address during connection set up, but both still
contain an MTP-SAP.
>
> And you may have designed your architecture so the ASPs have no need
> to know their point code (a much simpler configuration). This is
> nothing NEW or outside the spec.
You can do that, however, to signal SCCP congestion requires
identification of the SCCP that is suffering congestion, and the SCCP is
identified by its MTP-SAP (point code and SI value), not by a Global
Title. Therefore, the Affected Point Code is mandatory in the SCON,
just as it is mandatory in the N-PCSTATE Indication.
--brian
--
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/