Re: Congestion in M3UA/SUA and the use of the SCON
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Haresign, Haresign Lincoln wrote: (Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:35:44) > Brian, > > I was under the impression that we were trying to make the layers about > SUA unaware that they are running over IP. SCCP and Subsystem congestion are below the SCCP/SCCP-User interface, not above. --brian > My ASP today does not > require knowledge of point codes. And if SCON supported "source > address", the SG could properly implement the SSC procedures according > to the ITU specifications. The ASP only needs to know it's calling > address (which may not contain a PC). Because of your requirement > below, it is putting an additional and completely unneccessary > requirement on the ASP. > > Clearly you and I either disagree on this issue or we are failing to be > able to get our point across to each other. I will propose alternate > text for SUA relating to the SCON messsage. I realize that you don't > feel this is necessary however it may be that others in the SIGTRAN list > feel otherwise. > > Regards, > Lincoln > -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/