RE: Recommendation for SUA modifications
"Haresign Lincoln" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <849535E338E99741B7F7413F73253EDB02544387@us-nj-mail1.comverse.com> |
John, I agree...SGs always have point codes. With regards to ASPs, there are SOME architectures where PCs are NOT necessary. Of course there are others where they ARE necesssary. I'm trying to solve the problem of when they are NOT necessary and NO other problem. I'm sure we can think of many scenarios where affected PC is necessary. And I'm not arguing against those scenarios. But I think you have to admit that there are SOME architectures where it is not necessary for the ASP to know it's Point Code. As a matter of fact, we have this architecture deployed in several large networks today. If you'd like me to elaborate further, I'd be happy to. So if we go on the premise that there are some network architectures that do not require knowledge of point code in the ASP, then we either need to: 1) Unneccessarily configure the point code on the ASP only so that we can send an SCON with the required affected point code. OR: 2) Make the point code optional for certain scenarios. For example when the ASP and the SG share the same point code. Regards, Lincoln -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 2:18 AM To: [email protected]; Haresign Lincoln Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: [Sigtran] Recommendation for SUA modifications Hi all, >I don't see why SUA should be any different. I can't speak for the >other authors, but when we wrote the SUA RFC, I never considered that >an ASP or SG would ever not include a point code in an address. > >Making the point codes mandatory in address fields for all SUA messages >better promotes interoperability in all configurations, and the >miniscule expense of causing an ASP to provision a single point code >for an SG with only a single point code. Just as background - there were some discussions that ASPs might not have Point Codes, but some other work to really enable ASPs to funtion properly without Point Codes never really materialized. I think some additional work would be needed to make this usable. SGs were always considered to have Point Codes, in my opinion. John