RE: Recommendation for SUA modifications
"Haresign Lincoln" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <849535E338E99741B7F7413F73253EDB02544389@us-nj-mail1.comverse.com> |
Brian, First of all, perhaps I'm not trying to solve the problem of an SG with multiple point codes. Second of all, if the SG has multiple point codes, and the ASP sends a message with GT in the source and destination address, how does the SG know which point code to use? If you can answer that, then you can answer your question below. Regards, Lincoln -----Original Message----- From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 7:27 PM To: Haresign Lincoln Cc: Tolga Asveren; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Recommendation for SUA modifications Haresign, Haresign Lincoln wrote: (Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:56:47) > Tolga, > > [tolga]:I think what you are proposing should be fine. BTW, I may be > missing something but it seems to me that only RC should do it in > terms of communicating ASP congestion to SG. > > Yes, I'm seeming to believe that RC should do it also. > It won't for a multiple point code SG unless you register the routing key with a point code, in which case the ASP knows its point code and can easily populate it in SCON and other messages. --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/