RE: Recommendation for SUA modifications

Brain,

The RC is optional.  Read the spec.

Lincoln 

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 1:55 PM
To: Haresign Lincoln
Cc: Tolga Asveren; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Recommendation for SUA modifications

Haresign,

Haresign Lincoln wrote:
(Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:16:45)
> Brian,
> 
> Actually, the fact that an ASP can represent more than one point code 
> is even a stronger argument for having RC as an optional parameter in 
> the SCON message when being sent from ASP to SG and affected PC as 
> conditional.  And the SG does NOT always have to do anything with the 
> SCON.  After all, you said yourself that this was an optional
procedure.

Now you want to make RC optional?

> 
> However, if we enable the ability for the ASP to send the SCON with 
> RC, it opens the door to developers implementing features such as 
> reducing traffic to congested ASPs within an AS.  I don't think it is 
> necessary to define how this would be done.  I just want to have the 
> abilty to do it.

If you need it so bad, provision a point code.

--brian

--
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/