Re: Recommendation for SUA modifications

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:54:45 -0600

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.sigtran
Organization	http://www.openss7.org/
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Haresign,

Haresign Lincoln wrote:                                                           (Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:16:45)
> Brian,
> 
> Actually, the fact that an ASP can represent more than one point code is
> even a stronger argument for having RC as an optional parameter in the
> SCON message when being sent from ASP to SG and affected PC as
> conditional.  And the SG does NOT always have to do anything with the
> SCON.  After all, you said yourself that this was an optional procedure.

Now you want to make RC optional?

> 
> However, if we enable the ability for the ASP to send the SCON with RC,
> it opens the door to developers implementing features such as reducing
> traffic to congested ASPs within an AS.  I don't think it is necessary
> to define how this would be done.  I just want to have the abilty to do
> it.

If you need it so bad, provision a point code.

--brian

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/