RE: Recommendation for SUA modifications

"Haresign Lincoln" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <849535E338E99741B7F7413F73253EDB02544642@us-nj-mail1.comverse.com>
Brian,

I have no idea what you are talking about.  I never said ASPs route on
source address.

Lincoln 

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 1:51 PM
To: Haresign Lincoln
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Recommendation for SUA modifications

Haresign,

Haresign Lincoln wrote:
(Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:46:23)
> John,
> 
> The TC-USER "may" pass down the point code.  Fine.  In that case, the 
> ASP has knowledge of it's point code.  However, it is not a MUST.
> Therefore, let's try to solve that case.  Why do you feel it is 
> necessary to provion a Point Code on the ASP when the ASP never uses 
> the knowledge in normal routing scenarios?

ASPs don't route on source addresses.  Neither do SGs.  Neither does
SS7.
Gee, neither does IP.

--brian

--
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.