RE: Recommendation for SUA modifications

"Tolga Asveren" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <[email protected]>
please see below for typo corrected

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
> Behalf Of Tolga Asveren
> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 12:52 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Sigtran] Recommendation for SUA modifications
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 12:03 PM
> > To: Haresign Lincoln
> > Cc: Tolga Asveren; [email protected]; [email protected];
> > [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Recommendation for SUA modifications
> >
> >
> > Licoln,
> >
> > Haresign Lincoln wrote:
> >                  (Fri, 14 Oct 2005 11:36:11)
> > > Brian,
> > >
> > > 1) if multiple ASPs or AS can use the same association, this is a
> > > scenario where you wouldn't want to use SCTP flow control.
> >
> > Your right again!  The SUA specification is deeply flawed.  It currently
> > only allows 1 ASP per association.  It needs to be enhanced to
> > allow multiple
> > ASPs per association.  That should be possible with an I-G entry.
> >  We could
> > just add the ASP Id parameter to all the messages so that the SGP
> > can distinguish
> > between all the ASPs on the association.  Hey!  Why not
> multiple SGPs per
> > association too!  We could use the ASP Id in all the messages
> in the other
> > direction.
> [TOLGA]I think to use more than one association for multiple ASPs deserves
                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                    use  XXXXXXX  one
> some discussion. As a first question, why do we need multiple ASPs traffic
> on a single association? I know the "P" in ASP stands for
> "process" but OTOH
> practically it maps to a host -at least as far as I can see-. My opinion
> about that one is to be more cautious and if possible move
> forward with 1:1
> relationship between M3UA peer:SCTP association in the context of ASP
> congestion draft.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.