Re: ASP Capabilities value 0x2 of interworking field
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ilie, The signalling gateway capability, SS7 interworking and relay capabilities can be combined into any process (ASP, ISPS, SGP). --brian Ilie Glib wrote: (Mon, 19 Dec 2005 13:17:19) > Brian, > > I am sorry I was not clear enough. My claim was > > Registration Request (REG REQ) cannot be sent from an SGP, therefore > the value 0x2 indicating signalling gateway capability is meaningless, > unless IPSP and SGP functions can be combined in one Signalling > Process. > > Can an SGP act as an IPSP? > > > Thank you > > Ilie > > > On 12/19/05, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ilie, > > > > Ilie Glib wrote: (Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:39:07) > > > Brian, > > > > > > could you please answer the following questions > > > > > > 1) Can SG register via RKM? If not, why the value 0x2 that indicates > > > Signalling Gateway? > > > > You are confused. 0x2 indicates signalling gateway capability: i.e., > > the registering node has an SS7 network interfaces and behaves as an > > SG when interworking to that interface. > > > > > > > > 2) Is there any difference between capabilities 0x0 and 0x1 in SUA > > > > > > 0x0 indicates no interworking with SS7 Networks. > > > 0x1 indicates IP Signalling Endpoint (ASP), interworking with SS7 > > > networks. > > > > Yes, one supports interworking with SS7 networks and the other does not. > > > > > > > > I was more after a definition of the Relay capability in SUA > > > framework. Although SUA RFC mentions Relay and describes it, the > > > definition of Relay is missing. > > > > See SCCP specifications for a definition of a relay node. > > > > --brian > > > > -- > > Brian F. G. Bidulock > > [email protected] > > http://www.openss7.org/ > > -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/